« On Responding to Muddy Complaints -- and a Comment on Departmentalism | Main | O'Connor and Cromwell »
Sunday, June 23, 2024
Fifteen years of the Annual Law and Religion Roundtable
Tempus fugit, and all that. I recently returned from Sabanville -- I mean, Tuscaloosa -- and the Annual Law and Religion Roundtable, which I've been organizing and hosting with Nelson Tebbe (Cornell) and our own Paul Horwitz for fifteen (!) years now.
We got the idea, if I recall correctly, from a workshop-style conference for younger property-law scholars that Ben Barros (now at Stetson) and Nestor Davidson (now at Fordham) put together out in Colorado. Each year -- well, we had to Zoom two of them, and miss one year altogether, because of COVID - we've held our version at a different school -- a "movable feast", as Paul likes to say! -- and exploited the on-site generosity of different colleagues. Over the years, several hundred scholars -- from a variety of disciplines, at a range of career stages, with a variety of interests and perspectives -- have participated, and we've met from Stanford to Virginia to Toronto to Notre Dame (and a bunch of other places in between).
This tradition (!) has been -- for me, anyway! -- a highlight of the academic year. Notwithstanding disagreements about non-trivial questions, methodological differences, and a diversity of commitments and priors, the conversations have been productive and collegial, and the socializing and fellowship uplifting and encouraging. I've been particularly struck by (among other things) how strongly I've come to prefer the roudtable/workshop-type academic gathering to the panels-and-audience type (which is not to say I don't welcome your invitations to the latter!).
I know there are other, similar events that happen in other fields or around other themes ("The Schmooze", etc.), and I'd welcome hearing about others' experiences in the comments . . .
Posted by Rick Garnett on June 23, 2024 at 11:26 AM in Rick Garnett | Permalink
Comments
Question:
Regarding case assignments in both State and Federal Law, in for example :
Where in The Constitution does it specifically state that The State has the authority to determine which beloved sons and daughters of human persons , are not, in essence, human persons, and thus are not equal before the Law, and a right to privacy gives The State the authority to deny certain beloved sons and daughters their inherent unalienable Right to Life, the securing and protection upon which their inherent Right to Liberty and The Pursuit of Happiness depends.
One would think it necessary and proper for all Judges to know that there does not exist in reality, a son or daughter of a human person who is not, in essence, a human person as it is not possible for human persons to conceive a son or daughter who is not a human person from the moment of conception, and thus “equal before the Law.”
Is there a list of judges that believe that not all sons and daughters of human persons, are in essence, human persons or that it is sometimes necessary and proper to accuse certain persons of a crime without due process of Law?
Posted by: ND | Oct 4, 2024 4:09:26 PM
Something to think about in the days to come regarding the necessary proper balance of iron for maintaining health and fighting disease.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797506/
https://www.google.com/search?q=choline+for+anemia&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari
choline and hepcidin - Google Search
🙏💕🌹
Posted by: ND | Sep 27, 2024 10:40:22 AM
I apologize for the missing link!
Posted by: ND | Sep 16, 2024 5:57:23 PM
Perhaps it will be helpful this Academic Year to discuss the issues surrounding this issue at The Law And Religion Roundtable-
ttps://www.catholicworldreport.com/2024/09/08/vermont-covid-vaccination-case-raises-serious-question-about-parental-rights/
Godspeed!
Posted by: ND | Sep 16, 2024 5:55:14 PM
What was the origin of the idea for the conference mentioned in the text?
Posted by: Telkom University | Aug 22, 2024 8:56:31 AM