« JOTWELL: Bartholomew on Borchers on tag jurisdiction | Main | Personal or Impersonal Precedent? »
Monday, April 04, 2022
"Favorable termination" requires non-conviction and nothing more
Here is my SCOTUSBlog recap on Thompson v. Clark, decided Monday. Kavanaugh writes for six, holding that favorable termination for a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim need only show that the proceedings ended without a conviction. Alito dissents for himself, Thomas, and Gorsuch, rejecting the idea of malicious prosecution as a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The result is not surprising given oral argument, down to Alito likening such a claim to mythological creatures--today it is the chimera, at argument it was a centaur).
Posted by Howard Wasserman on April 4, 2022 at 09:53 PM in Civil Procedure, Constitutional thoughts, Howard Wasserman | Permalink
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.