« More movie stars and diversity jurisdiction | Main | Testing the Koufax Curse »

Wednesday, January 06, 2021

JOTWELL: Mullenix on Russell on frivolous defenses

The new Courts Law essay comes from Linda Mullenix (Texas), reviewing Thomas D. Russell, Frivolous Defenses, which focuses on tort defendants' non-compliance with the rules governing responsive pleadings. I spend time in Civ Pro on this subject, especially the way that defendants refuse to respond to allegations (common response: "Neither admit nor deny and strict proof demanded thereof," which is nonsense) and the refusal of any judge other than Milton ShadurZ"L of the ND Ill. to hold attorneys to account for these practices.

Posted by Howard Wasserman on January 6, 2021 at 09:41 AM in Article Spotlight, Civil Procedure, Howard Wasserman | Permalink

Comments

Thanks for this post. I'd be interested in talking with you about teaching Rule 8.

One of the followup pieces I am writing, titled Disrupting Frivolous Defenses, will in part concern Judge Shadur and his sua sponte review of answers.

Would it be possible for you to add tags for Torts, Insurance, and the Legal Profession to your post? I'm eager to reach those audiences, too, and I am a little uncertain of the structure of Prawfsblawg.

Thanks again,

Tom Russell
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3664917

Posted by: Tom Russell | Jan 14, 2021 12:06:16 AM

Post a comment