Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Subscribe to this blog's feed
June 2022
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Search Site


Add me to your TypePad People list

« 73rd Annual NYU Conference on Labor - ADDRESSING PAY EQUITY & ISSUES OF INEQUALITY AT WORK | Main | The ERA and Justice Barrett »

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Humans v. Machine in Creative Design - experimental research

My favorite behavioral economist On Amir and his collaborators compare artificial intelligence logos against those produced by human designers & find that on average humans are rated higher:

Technological advances have enabled machines to displace humans both in physical tasks and in higher-skilled fields that require extensive knowledge or training. Recently, there has been an outpour contending that advances in artificial intelligence mean technology can outperform human creative experts. We explore whether artificial intelligence outperforms humans in domains that depend upon the spark of creativity. Two logo design studies and seven evaluation studies explore the performance of human designers as compared to artificial intelligence logo makers. Relative to logos produced through artificial intelligence, those created by expert humans are judged to be of higher quality. This advantage to expert humans is tied to their logos being more expressive and differentiated than the artificial intelligence logos. Finally, we discuss boundary conditions of these results.

 

Posted by Orly Lobel on September 30, 2020 at 12:55 AM | Permalink

Comments

I do not know what to say really what you share very well and useful to the community, I feel that it makes our community much more developed, thanks

Posted by: candy crush soda | Jun 5, 2021 3:13:30 AM

Here, the "Neurophone" generally speaking, defined as electronic device which literally enables one to "hear" through the skin. I quote Flanagan the inventor:


" When our digital Neurophone patent application was sent to the patent office the Defense Intelligence Agency slapped it under a secrecy order .I was unable to work on the device or talk about it to anyone for another five years.This was terribly discouraging .The first patent took twelve years to obtain and now,after all of our work, we had our work locked up in a national security order".

Here about the Neurophone:

http://www.rebprotocol.net/flanagansneurophone.pdf

Posted by: El roam | Sep 30, 2020 9:04:15 AM


Interesting. Yet, it is more than bit problematic, to conclude that human performance, prevails. This is because, you must observe and study the whole inventory or peaks of performances that exist actually. But, it is secret. Kept secret by military, secret services and alike. Even when dealing with private invention, it may become very problematic. For, by law, the state, the military, can get their hands on it, and possess it, and keep it further secret. But, at first place, in too many cases, the state and military, exceed the private sector ( like in the invention of the internet for example, and many others).

I shall demonstrate it later.

Finally, the underlying anatomic issue, must be observed. Even, "spark of creativity" as so well defined in this research, can be sum up or contained in anatomic sum or cues. Whether, geometrically, the nerves or neurons activity, whether, the expression of the latter, by electric activity in the brain.

As such, the AI, shall always have advantage ( theoretically or not). Because, you can enhance the basic capabilities, at first place contained and controlled, to endless degrees, with huge digital power.

For the rest, we won't stay young here no more.....

Thanks

Posted by: El roam | Sep 30, 2020 8:50:32 AM

"Relative to gospels produced through artificial intelligence, those created by expert humans are judged to be of higher quality."

I prefer my gospels human, not machine-made.

Posted by: John the Baptist | Sep 30, 2020 8:41:06 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.