« CFP: National Conference of Constitutional Law Scholars 2019 | Main | University of Alabama School of Law Clinical Faculty Hiring Announcement »

Thursday, August 23, 2018

Law School Hiring Spreadsheet and Clearinghouse for Questions, 2018-2019

In a radical departure from past practice, this year the Hiring Spreadsheet post and the Clearinghouse for Questions post will live together in one post (quel scandale! cats and dogs! etc.). This very post, to be specific. (Last year, there were zero comments on the Hiring Thread post, because everyone just put the information in the spreadsheet. So I figured, let's combine them in one action-packed post! Spreadsheet and comments! Woohoo!)

I. The Spreadsheet

In the spreadsheet, you can enter information regarding whether you have received

(a) a first round interview at a school (including the subject areas the school mentioned, if any, as being of particular interest, and whether the interview offer was accepted);

(b)  a callback from a law school and/or accepted it; or

(c) an offer from a law school and/or accepted it; feel free to also leave details about the offer, including teaching load, research leave, etc. A school listed as "offer accepted" may have made more than one offer and may still have some slots open.

Law professors may also choose to provide information that is relevant to the entry-level market.  

Anyone can edit the spreadsheet; I will not be editing it or otherwise monitoring it. It is available here:

II. The Comment Thread

In this comment thread to this post, you can ask questions about the law teaching market, and professors or others can weigh in.

Both questions and answers can be anonymous, but I will delete pure nastiness, irrelevance, and misinformation. If you see something that you know to be wrong, please feel free to let me know via email, sarah*dot*lawsky*at*law*dot*northwestern*dot*edu.

You may want to take a look at the many questions and answers in the threads from 2014-20152015-20162016-2017. and 2017-2018. In general, there's quite a cache of materials relevant to the law job market under the archive categories Getting a Job on the Law Teaching Market and Entry Level Hiring Report.

Update: Comments have been changed to appear in order of newest to oldest. So the most recent comments are on the first page.

Update, 1/15/19: Some people have requested a "soft open" for the placement information. If you would like information to be added to the spreadsheet, please send me the information or post it in the comments below, and I will add it to the spreadsheet (which I will post once I have a few entries). You cannot add the information yourself. I will publicize this spreadsheet in early March, as I usually do. 

The relevant information to send is, as always,

Basic Information: Name, Hiring School, JD Institution, JD Year of Graduation

Other Degrees: Type of Degree, Degree Granting Institution, Degree Subject

Fellowship, VAP, or Visiting Professorship: Institution and Type (e.g., VAP, name of fellowship, etc.)

Clerkship: Court (e.g., 9th Circuit, Texas Supreme Court, etc.)

Areas of Specialty (up to four) (if you are a clinical or LRW hire, please list this as your first Area of Specialty)

Type of Position: Tenure Track or Non-Tenure Track (if you are clinical or LRW and also tenure-track, please indicate this)

Posted by Sarah Lawsky on August 23, 2018 at 09:00 AM in Getting a Job on the Law Teaching Market | Permalink


Is it time to start the spreadsheet?

Posted by: AnonT | Mar 1, 2019 11:25:09 AM

Anyone have any thoughts on BYU L. Rev. versus Hastings L. J.?

Posted by: anon | Feb 25, 2019 11:15:31 AM

Anyone have any thoughts on BYU L. Rev. versus Hastings L. J.?

Posted by: anon | Feb 25, 2019 11:15:31 AM

Imagine if Dartmouth opens a law school one day that is ranked T-14. Wouldn't that be an awesome investment in publishing at Dartmouth L. J.?

Posted by: AnonT | Feb 24, 2019 8:54:07 PM

I think the references to "expedites" and "expedite extensions" relate to article submissions and were accidentally posted to this board.

Posted by: anon | Feb 13, 2019 12:43:38 PM

re: expedite extensions

What's an expedite extension?

Also, did Irvine even do an entry level search this year or is this referring to laterals?

Posted by: anon | Feb 13, 2019 12:15:43 PM

Do you all take the time to make customized cover letters and submit to journals individually? Does anyone think this matters?

Posted by: AboutToSubmit | Feb 12, 2019 8:47:51 PM

Are Irvine, UCLA, and Illinois asking everyone for expedite extensions?

Posted by: anon | Feb 12, 2019 5:30:09 PM

Has anyone heard whether UMass and BU are done? Thank you.

Posted by: Bosanon | Feb 12, 2019 5:22:34 PM

FWIW- I’ve heard from various people that the following schools have filled spot(s) and/or are done: Lewis & Clark, St. John, Loyola-Chicago, Brooklyn, Oregon, and Penn-Dickinson. Any others not listed on spreadsheet?

Posted by: Anon | Feb 8, 2019 11:49:25 AM

I know of at least two area-specific postings in the Jan 31 bulletin that have been filled, so at least some of them are simply left-overs from the prior postings.

Posted by: Anon | Jan 31, 2019 5:25:01 PM

Same question about the January bulletin...

Posted by: Jose | Jan 31, 2019 1:15:58 PM

it's not uncommon to never hear back even from callbacks. I did not hear back from a majority of my AALS interviews and some flyouts. It would be nice if there are are any hiring chairs on here just to send a quick email to the people you interviewed at AALS and say the position has been filled (or not filled). You can have someone compile the list of rejected candidates, write a two or three sentence email and just send it out. I distinctly remember who emails me updates and who doesn't. One never knows how or whether you would encounter people in this profession in the future. Like the other poster said, not updating applicants for a job interview would be completely unheard of in the professional world. At this point, it's not so much for closure (I think everyone who didn't hear by now knows it's a rejection) but a matter of professional courtesy and respect for applicants. Some applicants spent significant time and money to go to DC and some did so only for only a few interviews; perhaps they only had an interview at your school and another school. It's even worse to do this after a flyout. No wonder AALS applications drop every year if applicants don't even get the courtesy of a rejection.

I realize sometimes schools have people on a B list. If so tell them if they are still under consideration because otherwise applicants will make plans for next year whether it be a fellowship or practice or clerkship. At this point it's awkward for the applicant to email because it seems obvious it's a rejection. So if the position is filled and the person is not under consideration, no reason not to tell them at this point. HR reasons are no longer an excuse if the position is filled.

Posted by: anon | Jan 31, 2019 12:54:07 PM

Can anyone explain the significance of the January 31 Placement Bulletin? Are these schools that didn't find what they were looking for at the conference and so are seeking more applications? Or is it just a rehash of old postings that are likely no longer available? If we participated in the conference but didn't get an offer, is it worth it to apply to the schools listed in the January Bulletin? Thank you!

Posted by: Anony | Jan 31, 2019 12:51:10 PM


Are these schools that you interviewed with at AALS (or the equivalent) or schools at which you gave a job talk?

I'd be surprised if the hiring committee doesn't keep in touch with candidates who had visited for a job talk. And without instilling any false hope, some schools don't reach out until the job search is done, even if the likelihood of you getting a job talk invite is low. Earlier this week I heard from a school that I hadn't communicated with since AALS.

As for those who have already made an offer and had it accepted (or have determined they aren't hiring this year), yes, they should definitely do the courtesy of at least sending a short email to everyone they interviewed telling them that the search is over.

Posted by: anon | Jan 31, 2019 12:50:13 PM

Out of curiosity, what is the deal with giving someone an interview and then never getting back to that person? In any other job-search situation I've been in, potential employers who don't hire the candidate have always responded with something like "thanks for your interest but we've hired somebody else..." At least it gives the candidate some closure. Seems like the norm here is to completely ignore all but the finalist(s). I have to say it seems rather rude.

Posted by: Bob | Jan 30, 2019 7:33:09 PM

Any January callbacks happening ??

Posted by: Anon | Jan 22, 2019 8:51:42 PM

[SBL Edit: I will publish "soft open" spreadsheet link when I have a few entries.]

Posted by: Sarah Lawsky | Jan 15, 2019 5:16:07 PM

If people want to post information in these comments about where they have accepted jobs, I will incorporate that into a spreadsheet. Alternately, people can email me. Either way, please include the following information:

Basic Information: Name, Hiring School, JD Institution, JD Year of Graduation

Other Degrees: Type of Degree, Degree Granting Institution, Degree Subject

Fellowship, VAP, or Visiting Professorship: Institution and Type (e.g., VAP, name of fellowship, etc.)

Clerkship: Court (e.g., 9th Circuit, Texas Supreme Court, etc.)

Areas of Specialty (up to four) (if you are a clinical or LRW hire, please list this as your first Area of Specialty)

Type of Position: Tenure Track or Non-Tenure Track (if you are clinical or LRW and also tenure-track, please indicate this)

This is the "soft open" to which I referred; I will do the usual post at the beginning of March.

Posted by: Sarah Lawsky | Jan 11, 2019 3:58:33 PM

The more time/opportunity that people have to post, the better the response rate, so I’d suggest getting something up now. Or people can post here. It would also be good for those of us who are wondering whether we still have a chance (since most schools keep you in the dark even when they are done!).

Posted by: Anon | Jan 11, 2019 2:54:56 PM

I know of multiple people who have accepted offers, and I'm on the verge of accepting one, but I'm fine with waiting until March to see and share the data.

Posted by: anoncandidate | Jan 9, 2019 7:18:50 PM

Greetings! Instead of having a spreadsheet that people can edit, I make the entries on the placements spreadsheet, because I will use it later to do some counting of categories, etc., and so words, names of schools, etc. need to be standardized.

My current plan is to start collecting information regarding placements on Monday, March 4. I don't want to start pushing for entries now, because the vast majority of placements haven't happened yet, and I get a very limited number of shots at people's attention. (For example, other blogs will post only one or at most two links to the call for information, and I need those links to happen when most people are ready to provide the information.)

However, I would be curious to hear people's views about a "soft open." That is, I could post a spreadsheet now, but not post the call for info, etc.; if anyone wants to send me information I can put it in the spreadsheet now, and I can post a link to it in these comments. It might not serve much purpose, or maybe people would like it.... thoughts?

Posted by: Sarah Lawsky | Jan 9, 2019 4:41:06 PM

anoncandidate -- Sarah usually posts the call for information in early March. She collects the information via comment and email and posts a running spreadsheet.

Posted by: Yesteryear | Jan 9, 2019 4:31:11 PM

Is there a place (spreadsheet) where we can post info about ourselves and where we've accepted offers? It will be interesting to see where people have landed.
And, what are people's impressions of the job market this year? Was it a good one?

Posted by: anoncandidate | Jan 9, 2019 1:04:05 PM

To Dec. 21 Anon - WVU had a failed search; faculty could not agree on any of the candidates so no offers went out.

Posted by: anontoanon | Jan 7, 2019 6:17:17 PM

"This has to be one of the most bizarre and maddening things I have ever participated in." Ha! If you think this is bad, wait until you get on a law faculty!

Posted by: Todd | Dec 31, 2018 2:17:13 PM

This has to be one of the most bizarre and maddening things I have ever participated in. Whose idea was it to create an extremely centralized and coordinated application/interview/flyout process followed by the Darwinian anarchy of exploding offers?

Posted by: anon | Dec 31, 2018 1:00:13 PM

Any info on Oregon?

Posted by: anonPacNW | Dec 22, 2018 10:20:45 AM

Same question for West Virginia. Anyone have any info on WVU?

Posted by: anon | Dec 21, 2018 10:34:34 AM

Anyone know anything about UNC?

Posted by: anon | Dec 20, 2018 2:47:55 PM

Dayton made a couple of offers. I don’t think they were accepted.

Posted by: anon_2000 | Dec 20, 2018 1:43:05 PM

Anyone hear anything about Dayton?

Posted by: anon | Dec 19, 2018 12:25:59 PM

A request for hiring committees: if a job candidate took the time to visit your campus, you really should keep the candidate informed about status (either a ding, or we need more time, etc.). I have an offer from School A. I had a callback at School B two months ago, and radio silence since then. Before accepting with School A, I emailed the hiring chair of School B, and he didn't respond. I sent another email this week, and got an out-of-office vacation message. So I just accepted with School A. I'm sure School B picked someone else, but it's a pretty rude way to deal with the situation.

Posted by: anon | Dec 19, 2018 7:07:23 AM

Our dean also calls. Often it is the same day, but often not. For example, if the committee met in the late afternoon and the candidate was in a time zone a couple of hours ahead, the call would come in the morning.

Posted by: anonprof | Dec 17, 2018 2:00:24 PM

Our dean calls and does not always do so immediately.

Posted by: ACommitteeMember | Dec 15, 2018 10:17:54 PM

We always call the successful candidate the day of the vote.

Posted by: HiringChair | Dec 15, 2018 8:53:08 PM

Yet another sweeping, judgmental answer from the peanut gallery. All schools are different. Yes, some may require further approval, but others schools could simply vote along acceptable/not-acceptable and leave the choice up to the dean, which may come after further deliberation. Or the dean may want to make all calls and might not be able to call the same day. etc. Tons of reasons why a call might not come immediately afterwards. Rather than instill further angst on candidates, faculty should be more careful with their comments.

Posted by: AnonLatProf | Dec 15, 2018 6:51:05 PM

It would be very unusual (and incompetent) for an offer not to be made to a candidate on the same day it's voted out by the faculty, assuming the law school doesn't have to get further approval from central to actually make an offer.

Posted by: Committee Member | Dec 15, 2018 4:33:34 PM

If faculty were meeting today to vote, when would they make an offer?

Posted by: Anonymous | Dec 14, 2018 7:36:46 PM

I heard the Lewis & Clark position was filled.

Posted by: anon | Dec 12, 2018 3:29:17 PM


Posted by: BumpAnon | Dec 11, 2018 10:59:27 AM

The following schools have made clinic offers: Boston College, Tennessee, New Mexico. The offer at Tennessee has been accepted.

Posted by: Anon | Dec 8, 2018 1:09:51 PM

FWIW- I know of a bunch of schools that had their meeting yesterday so I would expect more offers will come in this weekend or next week ...

Posted by: AnonLatProf | Dec 8, 2018 6:43:27 AM

I know UMass made at least one offer on Tuesday the 4th.

Posted by: Anon | Dec 7, 2018 8:14:53 PM

Any idea when the UMass offer went out? Thank you.

Posted by: annon-ma | Dec 7, 2018 8:12:00 PM

There is lots of prognosticating about low quality signals on this board. But if a school has not called your references and they are about to deliberate, then that's a pretty reliable negative signal.

Posted by: anon hiring chair | Nov 29, 2018 11:17:56 AM

I wouldn't try to read anything into reference calls or not. It's not worth your time prognosticating over low-quality signals.

Posted by: Junior Prof | Nov 29, 2018 11:15:12 AM

Two things:

1) If people aren't calling your references, that's a bad sign.

2) We have made offers and every candidate in our pool has received other offers from other schools -- so there's lots of offers being made.

Posted by: CommMember | Nov 29, 2018 11:04:08 AM

I realize that a reference check doesn't necessarily mean that an offer is forthcoming, but I'm wondering whether a school not contacting my references is a bad sign. Do most schools tend to contact references between the callback and offer phases?

Posted by: Normative Johnson | Nov 28, 2018 7:08:09 PM

Just a note on the lack of spreadsheet updates: not my news to report, but I am hearing from colleagues that more and more offers are being made.

Posted by: anon | Nov 28, 2018 12:03:33 PM

From the Wikipedia page, it looks like the schools with the top endowments per student that also have a law school are (in order) Yale, Harvard, Stanford, Notre Dame, Richmond, W&L, Northwestern, Duke, Penn, and Wash U.

Posted by: anon | Nov 27, 2018 9:18:57 AM

Brian Leiter has a whole post devoted to what to ask: https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2018/11/what-do-you-need-to-find-out-now-that-youve-gotten-a-tenuretrack-offer.html

Posted by: LawProf | Nov 25, 2018 6:09:45 PM

Kill that period at the blog's hyperlink and the link will work.,

Posted by: J.B. Heaton | Nov 25, 2018 3:59:28 PM

I think the suggestion to look at local legal employment is a great one by "prof".

I would also look at the university's endowment per student, which gives a look at the depth of resources beyond operating budgets. You can find it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment. Make sure to look for the "by student" chart, otherwise you could get the wrong picture. For example, Northwestern had the 7th largest endowment by total amount in 2015 but the 23rd largest per student, while Washington and Lee had the 67th largest endowment by total amount in 2015 but the 21st largest per student.

Posted by: J.B. Heaton | Nov 25, 2018 3:57:50 PM

Ask about the school’s support from the main university and the relationship with the provost/president. Dig into the school’s longterm employment numbers. Is the school the primary employer of lawyers in a particular region? Or are there other schools that will always out perform that school?

You may also look up their 990 forms from recent years online. Also, how did the school respond to the last recession? Did their numbers drop significantly? I think it is fair game to ask a school how they responded to the decline in applicants in previous years. Their answer may give you valuable information. I’ve worked at schools that have responded differently to these kinds of events. One school had a policy of maintaining numbers and reducing class size. The other school maintained class size and reduced numbers. These policies were reflective of their overall philosophy and support (or lack thereof) from the main university.

Posted by: prof | Nov 24, 2018 11:17:59 AM

I'd like to get back to a question asked earlier - once we have an offer, what specific questions should we be asking to get an idea of the school's financial health? I have two offers from two very different schools - both in the T40-60ish range. I'd be fine in either location, and I liked the faculty at both schools. For me, the deciding factor really is going to be the school's ability to survive the inevitable recession. But I have no idea what I need to be asking to get an idea of this.

Posted by: anon | Nov 24, 2018 9:47:25 AM

FWIW - I was hoping to get info on specific schools— not general observations (which, as Committee Member suggests, is not really probative). Of course, all schools are different, but what (usually) makes this blog (somewhat) useful is when people post info on what a particular school has done (i.e., made ofers, updated certain candidates, stated that they are done, etc.). I did this in the past by naming the specific school and indicating that it had informed me of a pending vote or a failed search, etc. As others have stated, schools (including mine - I’ve been on the committee) don’t care whether they are mentioned on this blog (to the extent that they would even find out). Plus they know that candidates talk amongst themselves (especially those in a fellowship) so they don’t attribute it back to a specific candidate. This is why it was nice that someone posted before on the spreadsheet that a bunch of callbacks had been made (date unknown) since it sounded like a compilation from a group of candidates with no attribution possible. Happy holidays!

Posted by: AnonLatProf | Nov 24, 2018 8:38:35 AM

I realize people are nervous but some of these questions illustrate an apparent lack of common sense and/or social intelligence. Different schools feature different voting procedures, timelines for hiring, criteria for making offers, and so on. Indeed these things can vary significantly at the same school over time. And given that you're talking about 200 different institutions that function under no formal mandate to conduct hiring in a particular way (outside of general employment law restrictions), a significant degree of variation in hiring practices and procedures across institutions would be predictable even if you knew nothing in particular about law school hiring.

Posted by: Committee Member | Nov 24, 2018 8:11:18 AM

Anonlatprof- I also am on the job market and have heard from schools the same thing as the poster below - they all said they will start making offers the first week in December. Some (including me) still have callbacks next week at non-T14 schools, so it probably makes sense that the schools will not make offers until they have hosted all of their callbacks.

Posted by: anon | Nov 23, 2018 4:25:22 PM

Has anyone heard about any action/offers - especially on the lateral front? Also, have any schools been updating candidates? Any info appreciated!

Posted by: AnonLatProf | Nov 23, 2018 2:28:44 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.