« Interested in Developing As a Legal Scholar? (A note from Prof Chris Lund) | Main | Mandate-ory Weekend Reading »

Thursday, December 05, 2013

RFRA, HHS, and Hobby Lobby

I have a short opinion piece in today's Los Angeles Times about the Hobby Lobby case, which the Court has agreed to hear and which involves a RFRA challenge by a for-profit business to the HHS contraception-coverage mandate.  (Apologies for the piece's somewhat overwrought headline, which I didn't write!).  My basic point is this:

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act reaffirmed an idea that is deeply rooted in America's history and traditions — namely, that politics and policy should respect and, whenever possible, make room for religious commitments and conscientious objections. True, religious liberty is not absolute, and, in a pluralistic society like ours, not all requests for exemptions and accommodations can, or should, be granted. Some religious liberty lawsuits will, and should, fail, but not simply because they involve what happens at work on Monday and not what happens in services on the Sabbath.

I should note that I do not deal in the piece with the argument -- pressed eloquently (natch) in this Slate essay by Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman -- that it would violate the Establishment Clause to accommodate, under RFRA, an employer like Hobby Lobby.  I do not agree that it would, in part for reasons set out by Eugene Volokh here.

Posted by Rick Garnett on December 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM in Rick Garnett | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference RFRA, HHS, and Hobby Lobby:


The comments to this entry are closed.