« Faction and the Internet | Main | Harvard Law Review Misspells the Name of Harvard Law Dean Griswold »

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Sen. Udall on the filibuster and entrenchment

Sen. Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico, is one of the leaders in the move for filibuster reform; he is the lead sponsor of the recent proposal that would end secret holds and require the filibustering minority to hold the floor and keep talking. In the current online version of Harvard Law & Pol'y Review, Sen. Udall lays out the argument why the entrenchment of the filibuster rule is unconstitutional and why it can be changed by a simple majority in the new Senate (under the so-called Constitutional Option or Nuclear Option or whatever the kids are calling it these days). The entrenchment point is essential to enacting any filibuster reform, unless the Republicans are willing to go along with rule reform (unlikely, although I wondered, after seeing Sen. Udall's proposal, whether the Republicans might see it as an acceptable move).

Posted by Howard Wasserman on January 11, 2011 at 05:56 PM in Constitutional thoughts, Current Affairs, Howard Wasserman, Law and Politics | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef0148c7855bd2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sen. Udall on the filibuster and entrenchment:

Comments

Filibuster reform is a bad idea. As I discuss on Politico (www.politico.com/arena/archive/open-mike-jan-8-9.html), the filibuster rule serves an important role in protecting minority interests and especially so in times of strong party-line voting.

Posted by: David Orentlicher | Jan 13, 2011 12:16:52 AM

Post a comment