« Conglomerate's 5th Annual Junior Scholar Workshop | Main | Citations to Authority on Law School Exams? »
Friday, June 04, 2010
de Toqueville and the Dean
This is my latest installment in a series of posts, aiming to help faculty understand their deans better. Lately I've been reading Leo Damrosch's new book, Tocqueville's Discovery of America. It's not a profound re-interpretation of de Tocqueville's work, but the biographical background does help me appreciate the work more fully. And it does make me think about healthy law school society.
Think of the faculty as the polity -- the entrepreneurs and members of voluntary associations and others who make a society into whatever it is, for good or for bad. Think of the dean as government -- there to handle collective action problems and other market failures. Or in the law school context, the dean is there to respond to faculty failure. There are certain things that only a dean can accomplish, but healthy law schools typically have faculty who build their own social capital without involving the dean. As de Tocqueville says, a functioning democracy depends more on privately-based social institutions and attitudes than it does on enacted laws.
Do you recognize that your colleagues need to understand more about the IRB to further their research? You don't need a dean to organize a presentation for your colleagues. Do you believe that students need some guidance on the selection of courses in the corporate and business law curriculum? You could declare a date for a presentation and advertise it through student groups.
Sometimes the best thing you can do for a dean is to ignore her as you go about the business of creating healthy private associations in a law school.
Posted by Ronald Wright on June 4, 2010 at 09:32 AM in Life of Law Schools | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef01348329e9d6970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference de Toqueville and the Dean:
Comments
In "the health law school society," the faculty are the members and the dean is the government. Which would mean that the students are . . . ? Absent? Inanimate? Livestock? Best not thought about?
Posted by: anon2 | Jun 6, 2010 4:17:29 PM
Anon -- I see your point. If faculty members distrust one another this profoundly, the dean has a lot more work to do because there's a lot more "faculty failure" (in the sense of market failure). By the way, the examples I chose were not fictional. In each case, I know of more than one law school where such events take place with no ugly incidents.
Posted by: Ron Wright | Jun 5, 2010 8:36:17 AM
Ronald--
This seems to work only if the faculty get along. Take your example of giving students guidance as to what courses to take. Inevitably, there will be vehement disagreements on the faculty about what the core, secondary, and tertiary courses are, and some faculty members will be angry that they weren't consulted, that their ideas weren't followed or presented, and so on. And, hells bells, if this radical idea comes from a junior member of the faculty. . . .
This is exactly the type of situation in which the Dean would put together a committee to investigate whether to offer such a presentation to students, and if so what (and whom) to include in it. It'll take months to do, feelings will be hurt, and the committee may agree on something great, okay, or terrible (or anything in between).
So color me skeptical that faculty members can just get up and do something like this without consequences.
Posted by: anon | Jun 4, 2010 10:13:02 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.