« What is the Opposite of "Parochial?" | Main | How Baseball Has Changed »

Friday, May 14, 2010

Choosing a Book, for Me

I will be picking a new book for my professional responsibility class next year (sorry future students!) because I just can't tolerate the touchy feely, problem-oriented approach of the book I picked this year.  I picked it because I thought, "Well, I don't write in this area, and perhaps it will be better if I go easy on myself with a subject about which I know comparatively little and my students, nearly to a one, find agonizingly, exquisitely dull."  As I've learned about the course and the material, I've actually enjoyed both its technical and theoretical contours.  I don't know (and often doubt) whether the same can be said of my students.

But I've decided to change books.  And most of the reasons I'm doing so have little to do with making PR a "fun" learning experience, or with making it seem more alive, or real-life-problem-y, or anything so insufferably "pedagogical."  I am not looking for a book that somehow conveys the tone of a schoolmarmish scold: "This is really important stuff!!  You ought to be paying attention to this, and tsk tsk if you don't, you irresponsible so and so!!  You know, you may not realize it now, but this is the most important course in the whole curriculum!!"  What a horrible bore -- the model of education as cod-liver oil, or law professor as Sir Galahad.  At all events, even if I did have these sorts of aims in mind for students, I have a feeling that there would be something counter-productive about this approach.  Who can blame them for rolling their eyes at such rubbish?

No, I'm changing books because I want a book that suits my style and interests, that will keep me more engaged with the material.  I'm changing books for me, not for them.  My hope, of course, is that changing books for me will make me able to teach the course with more verve, with greater gusto, and that in doing so, students' interest in the course will rise.  But the thing to focus on is my interests, the ideas, material, and style of instruction that turns me on (or against which I can teach with relish), not on what my students may or may not find of interest.  Especially with a course like this, that's far too difficult to predict.  But more importantly, the book and I are constant companions -- year after year, we'll be there, keeping each other company.  We ought to enjoy that relationship. 

Posted by Marc DeGirolami on May 14, 2010 at 03:36 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef0133ed9d1613970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Choosing a Book, for Me:

Comments

Anonymous (and anyone else interested in commenting on a specific professor): this post was about a certain way to go about selecting a course book -- which I thought might well have drawn criticism on its own terms. It was certainly not soliciting anonymous opinions about the practices of particular professors. Please ventilate elsewhere.

Posted by: Marc DeGirolami | May 15, 2010 4:45:01 PM

John Steele was my professor for PR, and I disliked the approach he took to giving us access to his course materials. I didn't mind not using a casebook, but when I took the course, he emailed each week's reading materials to us as a very large pdf file about a week before they were to be discussed in class. He seldom if ever announced the size of upcoming readings in advance. This made it difficult for students to schedule reading and prep. I and many of my classmates would have preferred a course reader/packet format.

Posted by: anonymous | May 15, 2010 4:24:58 PM

John -- thanks, on both counts. I appreciate the list. Was beginning to assemble an armada of casebooks to look over this summer, and the list will help. It may well be that I get to where you are as well, and simply assemble material.

Posted by: Marc DeGirolami | May 15, 2010 7:24:17 AM

Consider what an experienced attorney does in representing a client in a high profile case as an iceberg: one-seventh may be visible to the public but the remaining six-sevenths the public may never know. In adversarial proceedings, professional responsibility - or irresponsibility - may be below the water line, protected by attorney/client privilege.

Posted by: Shag from Brookline | May 15, 2010 6:32:10 AM

Marc,

That's the same reason I stopped using texts and now use materials that I personally find interesting (and that meet my standards for what needs to be covered). At the same time, after teaching a hypo, article, etc., I ask the students to vote "keep it or chuck it." If it doesn't work for them as well as for me, out it goes. Within a few years, your materials will be in great shape.

Btw, a while back I posted a listing of all the general PR texts out there. It may be a touch dated -- for example, I think that David McGowan has a new text out -- but here it is:


http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2006/10/professional_re.html

Posted by: John Steele | May 14, 2010 6:53:20 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.