« Rap and Conservative Talk Radio | Main | The DMV »
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Book List for New Law Professors
What books would you recommend to new law professors? Perhaps we can create a list in the comments.
Posted by Eric E. Johnson on October 7, 2009 at 09:20 PM in Research Canons | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef0120a6223b09970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Book List for New Law Professors:
Comments
I think that Government by Judiciary is a good book to read. I'm not even an Originalist and I enjoyed the book's history of the 39th Congress even though I disagree with Berger, especially regarding Plessy.
Posted by: anon | Oct 8, 2009 7:43:55 PM
A few thoughts:
1. The Least Dangerous Branch - Bickel
2. The Concept of Law - Hart
3. The Summa: Treatise on Law - Aquinas
4. Taking Rights Seriously - Dworkin
5. The Morality of Law - Fuller
6. Nicomachean Ethics - Aristotle
I am a bit...jurisprudentially biased...though....
Posted by: Jonathan | Oct 8, 2009 4:10:58 PM
Brian is right about the "philosophy of law and legal theory" bibliography, indeed, the description applies to all of the law-related and non-law bibliographies you'll find in the Directed Reading series: the lists were not intended to merely circumscribe titles for those "looking for things they HAVE to know."
Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Oct 8, 2009 8:43:00 AM
The Fisher & Kennedy "Canon" reprints a number of good pieces, though it is a bit weirdly Harvard-centric. Ward Farnsworth's book "The Legal Analyst" is actually very useful for those new to law teaching, or students thinking about law teaching (with the caveat that the "Jurisprudence" chapter has almost nothing to do with jurisprudence).
It does strike me that Professor Johnson's list is rather titled towards legal history; I would be very surprised if most law professors had read most of those books, though I imagine everyone has dipped into Friedman and Horwitz at one point or another. But I can't think of a reason why those new to law teaching *ought* to be reading these books unless, of course, their work has an important historical dimension to it. A nice thing about the Farnsworth book is one can dip into it depending on one's interest, and pick up vocabulary and concepts that are of general applicability. The book has a strong L&E tilt, obviously, but it's soft L&E, of the kind that is now pervasive in the legal academy and legal scholarship.
Patrick's bibliography, linked above, is quite comprehensive, but wildly overinclusive from the standpoint of someone looking for things they *have* to know.
Posted by: Brian | Oct 8, 2009 8:18:01 AM
Dear imminent: Spelling error noted and corrected. Thanks!
Posted by: Eric E. Johnson | Oct 8, 2009 6:12:08 AM
"imminently" readable?
Posted by: imminent | Oct 8, 2009 3:29:12 AM
I have no idea whether anyone reads Grant Gilmore's The Death of Contract anymore, but that's my suggestion. Brief, hilarious, brilliant.
Posted by: elektratig | Oct 8, 2009 3:17:48 AM
Here's the URL left out above: http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/2008/03/directed-reading.html
Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Oct 8, 2009 1:17:51 AM
Eric,
As a follow-up to your parenthetical comment, and by way of updating several of the lists in the "research canons" project, please see my Directed Reading series at Ratio Juris, the latest compilation for which covers "philosophy of law and legal theory:"
Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Oct 8, 2009 1:15:14 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.