« Law school as intellectual exercise | Main | And so this is Christmas ... or not »
Monday, December 08, 2008
The Irrepressible Myth of Rethinking and Taking Things Seriously: A Reply to Wexler
Jay's post on the use of Rethinking and Taking Seriously in legal scholarship reminds me that my current project (to be eviscerated at PrawfsFest! this week) is entitled The Irrepressible Myth of Klein. Surprisingly enough, a Westlaw search found only three other cases that have been tagged as irrepressible myths by scholars.
Can you name them?
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett: Adam Steinman
Marbury v. Madison: Michael Paulsen
Erie RR v. Tompkins: John Hart Ely
Posted by Howard Wasserman on December 8, 2008 at 10:27 AM in Article Spotlight | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef0105364d7f07970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Irrepressible Myth of Rethinking and Taking Things Seriously: A Reply to Wexler:
Comments
Don't forget:
"X and its Discontents" and
"We are all X Now."
Posted by: Law Review Articles Editor | Dec 9, 2008 8:19:00 PM
Indeed you have. Welcome.
Posted by: krs | Dec 9, 2008 4:44:16 PM
Yes, but we've brought a fresh keg!
Posted by: Jay Wexler | Dec 8, 2008 5:52:03 PM
You and Jay are both late to the party.
http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/08/disaggregating-.html
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_sample_law_re.html
Posted by: krs | Dec 8, 2008 3:00:55 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.