« A Critique of "National Security Courts" | Main | Cert. denied in the border fence case »

Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin and the First Amendment

Comedian George Carlin died yesterday of heart failure at age 71. He dies just after being named recipient of (but before receiving) the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor.

Ironically for Carlin's status as a hero of the First Amendment, his death also comes less than two weeks before the 30th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, a case that centered on Carlin's famous, indecent-but-not-obscene "Filthy Words" routine, where the Court held that a comedy routine discussing the seven basic dirty words in the English language is not fully protected on broadcast radio and television. He also dies the term before the Supreme Court hears arguments and decides FCC v. Fox Television, a case dealing with FCC regulation of "fleeting expletives," that might, depending on what course the Justices take, tell us something how much doctrinal vitality Pacifica still has.

Of course, Pacifica remains a doctrinal outlier, a case loathed by most highly speech-protective scholars, myself included. It rested on the specious rationale that broadcast radio and television is uniquely pervasive and intrusive into the home and may easily assault unwilling listeners in their home who flip a switch not realizing what awaits them (never mind that the complaint in the case was filed by someone who heard the routine while driving in his car). The Court has spent thirty years distinguishing the case as to every other medium--cable, telephone, and the internet--although it is not clear why those media are any less intrusive or any ore likely to catch an unwilling listener off-guard. Indeed, one of the funnier arguments against the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (the first, blanket ban on indecent speech on the internet) was that it rendered unlawful the internet posting of the Pacifica opinion itself, which included an appendix containing the full text of the routine.

Ronald K.L. Collins offers more thoughts, with which I agree, on Carlin's free-speech legacy. And Deven Desai offers a different, non-free-speech, piece of Carlin's comedic best.

Posted by Howard Wasserman on June 23, 2008 at 02:13 PM in Current Affairs, First Amendment | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef00e553861f078834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference George Carlin and the First Amendment:

Comments

What has always made FCC v. Pacficia a simultaenously amusing and frustrating case to read is the degree to which the Court simply didn't get Carlin's routine. Carlin is sitting there very politically mocking the fact that certain segments of society care more about enforcing taboos than about the substance of what is being said and, therefore, lose all powers of reason when particular words come flying at them, and then the Court goes off and proves his point by reading a powerful political performance as a juvenile screed. The irony is so juicy that it is almost--but not quite--worth living with the doctrine.

Posted by: Andrew Siegel | Jun 23, 2008 5:41:01 PM

Hey Howard. I never think of George Carlin without thinking about the 1st Amendment. In his own way, he really was a 1st Amendment hero. I had the good fortune to meet him years ago when I was a college junior speaking on a panel about speech codes on college campuses. Coincidentally, Carlin was there not because of his 1st Amendment interests, but because his daughter, then in the communications school (this was at UCLA), had put together the panel. Anyway, I remember his chatting with some of us after the panel about the 1st Amendment. He seemed like such a nice guy, and so genuinely engaged and concerned about free speech. I always smile and remember that day when, now as a law professor, I teach FCC v. Pacifica or write about it in an article. Carlin will be missed!

Posted by: Heidi Kitrosser | Jun 23, 2008 3:15:37 PM

Post a comment