« Damages for Loss of Stormtrooping | Main | How much is the life of a foreigner worth? »
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Weekend Trivia Challenge - Top Cited Law Review Article of All Time
According to a 1996 study by Fred R. Shapiro published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, which law review article is the most cited of all time in other law review articles?
Answer below the fold ...
"The Problem of Social Cost" by Ronald H. Coase
The Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 3, p. 1 (1960)
Not a big surprise, huh? Below is a list of the top 50. See Fred R. Shapiro, The Most-Cited Law Review Articles Revisited, 71 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 751 (1996). The full list of the top 100 is in Shapiro's article.
By the way, Shapiro's article itself has done quite well, garnering 127 cites as of today. For comparison, the lowest ranked article to make Shapiro's top 100 had 204 cites.
Rank | Cites | Article |
1 | 1741 | Ronald H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1960). |
2 | 968 | Herbert Wechsler, Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1959). |
3 | 913 | Gerald Gunther, The Supreme Court, 1971 Term--Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection, 86 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1972). |
4 | 728 | Charles A. Reich, The New Property, 73 Yale L.J. 733 (1964). |
5 | 719 | Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457 (1897). |
6 | 645 | Abram Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1976). |
7 | 609 | Robert H. Bork, Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems, 47 Ind. L.J. 1 (1971). |
8 | 582 | Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1667 (1975). |
9 | 578 | Samuel D. Warren & Louis D. Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1890). |
10 | 550 | Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1685 (1976). |
11 | 542 | Guido Calabresi & A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, 85 Harv. L. Rev. 1089 (1972). |
12 | 523 | Frank I. Michelman, Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1165 (1967). |
13 | 489 | Marc Galanter, Why the ‘Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 Law & Soc'y Rev. 95 (1974). |
14 | 460 | Joseph Tussman & Jacobus tenBroek, The Equal Protection of the Laws, 37 Cal. L. Rev. 341 (1949). |
15 | 454 | Stewart Macaulay, Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study, 28 Am. Soc. Rev. 55 (1963). |
16 | 446 | John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade, 82 Yale L.J. 920 (1973). |
17 | 436 | William W. Van Alstyne, The Demise of the Right-Privilege Distinction in Constitutional Law, 81 Harv. L. Rev. 1439 (1968). |
18 | 402 | Owen M. Fiss, The Supreme Court, 1978 Term--Foreword: The Forms of Justice, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1979). |
19 | 384 | Henry G. Manne, Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, 73 J. Pol. Econ. 110 (1965). |
19 | 384 | Frank I. Michelman, The Supreme Court, 1968 Term--Foreword: On Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 7 (1969). |
21 | 370 | William L. Prosser, The Assault Upon the Citadel (Strict Liability to the Consumer), 69 Yale L.J. 1099 (1960). |
22 | 360 | Anthony G. Amsterdam, Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment, 58 Minn. L. Rev. 349 (1974). |
23 | 357 | Robert H. Mnookin & Lewis Kornhauser, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, 88 Yale L.J. 950 (1979). |
24 | 356 | Frank H. Easterbrook & Daniel R. Fischel, The Proper Role of a Target's Management in Responding to a Tender Offer, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1161 (1981). |
25 | 355 | Henry M. Hart, Jr., The Supreme Court, 1958 Term--Foreword: The Time Chart of the Justices, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 84 (1959). |
26 | 346 | William J. Brennan, Jr., State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 489 (1977). |
27 | 341 | Henry M. Hart, Jr., The Power of Congress to Limit the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts: An Exercise in Dialectic, 66 Harv. L. Rev. 1362 (1953). |
28 | 340 | H.L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 (1958). |
29 | 338 | Laurence H. Tribe, Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 1329 (1971). |
30 | 337 | Paul Brest, The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, 60 B.U. L. Rev. 204 (1980). |
31 | 336 | John Hart Ely, Legislative and Administrative Motivation in Constitutional Law, 79 Yale L.J. 1205 (1970). |
32 | 327 | Roberto Mangabeira Unger, The Critical Legal Studies Movement, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 561 (1983). |
33 | 323 | Thomas I. Emerson, Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment, 72 Yale L.J. 877 (1963). |
34 | 319 | Alexander Meiklejohn, The First Amendment is an Absolute, 1961 Sup. Ct. Rev. 245. |
35 | 317 | Bruce J. Ennis & Thomas R. Litwack, Psychiatry and the Presumption of Expertise: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom, 62 Cal. L. Rev. 693 (1974). |
36 | 306 | Lon L. Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law--A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 630 (1958). |
37 | 303 | Henry M. Hart, Jr., The Relations Between State and Federal Law, 54 Colum. L. Rev. 489 (1954). |
38 | 301 | Cass R. Sunstein, Interest Groups in American Public Law, 38 Stan. L. Rev. 29 (1985). |
39 | 299 | Richard A. Posner, A Theory of Negligence, 1 J. Legal Stud. 29 (1972). |
40 | 292 | Joseph L. Sax, Takings and the Police Power, 74 Yale L.J. 36 (1964). |
41 | 291 | Robert M. Cover, The Supreme Court, 1982 Term, Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1983). |
42 | 290 | Duncan Kennedy, The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries, 28 Buff. L. Rev. 205 (1979). |
43 | 288 | Lon L. Fuller & William R. Perdue, Jr., The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages (pts. 1 & 2), 46 Yale L.J. 52, 373 (1936-37). |
44 | 287 | Friedrich Kessler, Contracts of Adhesion--Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract, 43 Colum. L. Rev. 629 (1943). |
44 | 287 | Harry Kalven, Jr., The New York Times Case: A Note on ‘The Central Meaning of the First Amendment,’ 1964 Sup. Ct. Rev. 191. |
46 | 284 | Lon L. Fuller, The Forms and Limits of Adjudication, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 353 (1978). |
47 | 282 | Thomas C. Grey, Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution?, 27 Stan. L. Rev. 703 (1975). |
47 | 282 | Frank I. Michelman, The Supreme Court, 1985 Term--Foreword: Traces of Self-Government, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1986). |
49 | 278 | Richard A. Epstein, A Theory of Strict Liability, 2 J. Legal Stud. 151 (1973). |
49 | 278 | William L. Cary, Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflection Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L.J. 663 (1974). |
Posted by Eric E. Johnson on April 20, 2008 at 09:29 AM in Games | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef00e5520466918834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Weekend Trivia Challenge - Top Cited Law Review Article of All Time:
Comments
I decided to see what influence these articles had outside the ivory tower - in the courts. You can see my results here.
Posted by: Klerk | Apr 23, 2008 10:48:31 AM
Is this weighted for year of publication? Should it be, at least somehow? Doesn't it seem methodologically questionable that Oliver Wendell Holmes' 1893 article gets the same score as ones written in the mid-eighties? Just a thought.
Posted by: Legal Writing for Dummies | Apr 22, 2008 7:09:37 PM
Why did you just publish 12-year old news? When not update the article? Then you'd have something original and relevant.
FYI, in 1976 the most frequently cited articles were . . . doesn't matter anymore.
Posted by: Captain Obvious | Apr 22, 2008 5:08:47 PM
I suspect most professors have read a few of them and some have read a lot of them, depending on the area they go into. For example, I did a lot of law & economics and had read many of the articles here. Some of there were required reading in my 1L Elements class.
This is an interesting list - I wonder what the citation numbers look like 12 years later - I suspect that there are many more articles coming out per year, which means that citations to some of these articles may be much higher.
Posted by: Michael Risch | Apr 20, 2008 6:48:17 PM
Oh, good question, Jason. I read them all back in high school.
Posted by: Eric E. Johnson | Apr 20, 2008 2:31:13 PM
Cynical question: how many of these fifty has the average law professor read when he/she starts teaching? Or even after ten years of teaching?
Posted by: Jason W. | Apr 20, 2008 1:39:30 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.