« Research Canons: Legal History | Main | The Good Prof. Bainbridge and the next Harriet Miers »

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

The Second Circuit to SCOTUS: Up Yours!

I'm not exactly sure how I missed this, but the Second Circuit has reconsidered its original ruling in Coke v. Long Island Care at Home and affirmed its holding, notwithstanding the Supreme Court's summary and unanimous directive to reconsider it.  I'm delighted.  Full disclosure: I worked on the case when I was clerking and was very disappointed about the Supreme Court's vacatur. 

As you may recall, the Second Circuit had held that home health care attendants who are employed through third party agencies cannot be denied minimum wage and overtime under the FLSA.  The defendants and Department of Labor (DOL) had argued that these workers qualified for the "companionship services" exemption, as the DOL had defined the term through a set of interpretive regulations.  In a careful reading of Mead, the Second Circuit refused to give the agency's construction Chevron deference -- and held the regulation unenforceable because it failed Skidmore deference. 

In a last ditch effort to help the home health care industry avoid paying minimum wage, the DOL wrote up a memo a year and four months after the Second Circuit's ruling and submitted it to the Supreme Court to prove that they had carefully considered the regulation; they further sought to show that the DOL had always considered the "third-party employer" exemption legislative rather than interpretive (which would entitle it to Chevron deference).  The Supreme Court vacated the Second Circuit ruling to give the lower court a chance to consider the memo, notwithstanding the fact that the DOL had every opportunity to make the arguments in the memo at that court (though didn't -- they apparently didn't really think it was plausible that they'd lose, I suppose).

The Second Circuit dutifully reconsidered its opinion.  But rather than take the hint from the Supreme Court, it stood its ground.  Fun, fun!  Here's the latest opinion from the Second Circuit: Download 037666_remand_opn.pdf.  I'm sure the saga will continue.

Posted by Ethan Leib on October 18, 2006 at 10:27 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef00d83460a05a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Second Circuit to SCOTUS: Up Yours! :

» Round-Up from SCOTUSblog
Ethan Lieb at Prawfsblawg has a post here highlighting the continuing legal saga of Coke v. Long Island Care at Home; he believes the Second Circuit continues to thumb its nose at the Supreme Court with this recent opinion. John... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 19, 2006 5:00:14 PM

Comments

Like, in the way the 5th Circuit or the Texas Supreme Court "don't get along well" with the Supremes? Or the way the 9th Circuit (Reinhardt, CJ., dissenting) doesn't always see eye to eye? Or the way Chief Judge Moore disagrees with it?

I think everyone has a beef with the SCOTUS, particularly when
a) they are right, in their view, and the S Ct isn't, or when
b) they may have gotten something wrong below, but that doesn't make it nice to be reversed.

Nevertheless, an interesting case, and thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Posted by: Eh Nonymous | Oct 19, 2006 5:41:39 PM

I don't think the Second Circuit gets along with the Supreme Court very well. Every once in a while, it seems to just get a defiant streak. Cf. Herbert v. Lando 781 F.2d 298 (2d Cir.1986) (Second Circuit invents incremental harm doctrine); Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496 (1991) (Supreme Court flatly rejects incremental harm doctrine); Church of Scientology v. Behar, 238 F.3d 168 (2nd Cir. 2001). (Second Circuit renames incremental harm doctrine and boldly declares that Herbert v. Lando is still law in the circuit).

Posted by: Paul Gowder | Oct 18, 2006 6:45:19 PM

Post a comment