Wednesday, October 10, 2012
The political is the personal
One of the venerable "predictors" of a presidential election is the World Series winner--American League team means Republican president, National League team means Democratic president. It has held 16 out of 26 times (when I first learned about it in a freshman poli sci class in 1986, it had held 13 out of 20 times).
Now, I'm a Cubs fan, so my rooting and political interests generally align (not that anyone is worrying about the Cubs playing in the World Series). My wife, however, is an Orioles fan and I have been watching and rooting for them (and wearing a '70s-era bird hat) as a show of spousal support. But with the election fast-approaching, Obama's polls tanking, and Andrew Sullivan losing his mind, I am beginning to wonder if I should continue rooting for an AL team right now. What should I do?By the way, if you are looking for other sports-related predictors, try this: If the Redskins win their final home game before the election, the incumbent party retains the White House. This has held in 18 of the last 19 elections. The 'Skins play the Carolina Panthers on November 4.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The political is the personal:
I've always found the Redskins predictor more plausible. After all, many politicians and appointees from the president's party will attend that Redskins game. If the fates are on their side generally, then of course the team they are cheering for should win and their political party should keep the White House. It is an instance of correlation not causation.
Posted by: Jason Marisam | Oct 10, 2012 10:21:42 AM