« Adversarial Journalism | Main | The Death of Portfolio »
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
In-Class Exercise: Guess My Politics
A while back I posted about the question of whether law professors ought to disclose their political convictions in class. There was a good discussion in the comments. As I wrote then, my personal preference has been to be plain about my beliefs rather than dance around them.
It turns out that if disclosure is my goal, I'm doing a lousy job.
Posted by Eric E. Johnson on April 29, 2009 at 08:01 PM in Law and Politics, Teaching Law | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef0115705eee61970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference In-Class Exercise: Guess My Politics:
Comments
The crit that still lies buried and repressed within me wants to say that the students saw you as conservative because there's a conservative deep structure to the law that you teach. Bad repressed crit. Bad. Bad.
Posted by: Paul Gowder | Apr 30, 2009 1:55:01 AM
If I were a student in that class I would have demanded a refund of the appropriate portion of my tuition; what a ridiculously self-important exercise in conceit.
Posted by: Xavier | Apr 30, 2009 9:42:41 AM
It's probably a good idea that you're waiting a while to ask again. Now that you've given away the answers here, you can't just recycle the exam question next year.
Posted by: James Grimmelmann | Apr 30, 2009 10:50:04 AM
Xavier, would you really have demanded a refund? I mean, really? I know that asking for a refund is a convenient rhetorical trope to complain about what you see as misuse of class time, but let's not exaggerate. Every professor "wastes" a little time on matters that aren't directly material to class. (I ranted about the addition of blue to SweeTarts in my IP class on Tuesday.) More often than not, it improves the overall educational experience. Sometimes it adds context; sometimes it humanizes the professor and breaks down the hierarchy of the classroom a bit. Eric learned that the impressions he's giving off in class aren't quite the ones he means to. That'll benefit his future classes.
Posted by: James Grimmelmann | Apr 30, 2009 10:57:05 AM
I don't think the students views are necessarily based on the professor's teachings. Most of your students are in their mid-twenties (I assume) and, if that is so, they still operate in a pseudo-egotistical world. Perhaps they don't think it is still all about them individually, but they do still see the world in an us versus them arena. Assuming, as well, that the professor is in his or late thirties (or beyond), he will seem older, and therefore, conservative at least in some views. The students will assume that at your age, for instance, you would be against or at least not willing to address gay marriage. Some of the response, too is based on the student's perceptions about how liberals and conservatives act. If you act as they do, then you have the same world view. If your behavior is different, and if they find it offensive, they will determine that you must have the opposite world view.
I personally think your exercise was quite interesting. My sister and I are a year apart in age. One of us believes our parents raised us to be republicans, while the other believes we were raised to be democrats. Dad and Mom NEVER discussed politics, money or sex with us or in front of us. Seriously, even when we had questions. Mom is long gone. Dad still refuses to have the discussion and is quite amused that we still don't know how he leans.
Posted by: plugging away | May 4, 2009 9:36:07 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.