« "Co-opting" "human being" | Main | The 4th of July »

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Where Can Legal Academic Work Flourish?

I don’t really mean this as a metaphysical question. Recently, I have soured on the café as a venue for working. Despite—or perhaps because of—decades of addiction to caffeine, and despite a previously inveterate allegiance to coffee shops, from New York, to Cambridge, to Irvine, and even to the Palo Alto Starbucks at the corner of Stanford Avenue and El Camino Real, I now find myself propelled out of every such institution I enter almost as soon as I have stepped inside.

On a few recent occasions, I have thought that I would jostle myself from my routine and head out on the streets of Brooklyn in search of a venue for reading and writing. One place appeared promising and bestowed with a smattering of people seemingly engaged in similar kinds of activity. When I entered though, the agitated fingers tapping on tables rather than keyboards, the I-Pods sitting beside uniform Macs, and the flies making calculated dives at the customers quickly dissuaded me from staying. Most of my other such forays have met a similar fate.

Perhaps this souring on the coffee shop represents a more general phenomenon—just a couple of days ago, Starbucks announced a plan to close six hundred of its stores. Could the café be going the way of the chocolate house, a center of sociability in late seventeenth-century England? Starbucks and its kin seem under attack on at least two fronts. The yogurt craze that commenced in Los Angeles has hit the East Coast now, and places like Pinkberry offer light and airy spaces that promise treats at least supposedly more salutary than a mocha frappuchino topped with whipped cream. And, of course, wine bars may hold renewed appeal for those who pay attention to the reports of red wine’s seemingly miraculous longevity-enhancing powers.

But when, exactly, is it appropriate to work in a wine bar, and what kind of work can one do there? A lawyer friend of mine recently explained how convenient it was to be able to download books to his PDA, because then he could read at the neighborhood establishment without seeming anti-social. According to his account, it is almost always acceptable to consult a Blackberry or its equivalent, but not to bring actual reading material into a bar. So I was a bit surprised recently when walking by a wine bar in Manhattan on the Upper West Side to see someone perched at the window writing, with one hand poised on a glass. Taking heart from this image, and in need of occupying half an hour while waiting for an appointment, I walked in and placed myself on a nearby stool. At first, I furtively secreted my Westlaw printouts beneath the table, hoping the other occupants wouldn’t notice, but when two more women entered and appeared to be making the gestures of writing, I decided I could be more obtrusive about my activity. The experience was quite satisfying, and I concluded that I would definitely return. On my way out though, I looked more closely at what these other seeming Barbeiteren were doing—all three were filling out series of pastel cards in immaculate handwriting. Perhaps wine bars weren’t meant for law work after all….

Posted by Bernie Meyler on July 3, 2008 at 09:41 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6a7953ef00e55385f8b18833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Where Can Legal Academic Work Flourish?:

» Hmm... maybe try working at the office? from Corp Reform - Not Tort Reform
Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I tend to do my best work sitting at a desk at my office. Neither coffee houses nor wine bars appeal to me. Besides, how would I lug a dual-monitor PC down to either venue? [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2008 5:29:52 PM

Comments

I have actually done various kinds of work in jazz clubs before. The wine bar wouldn't even warrant a blink. But I'm a little odd...

Posted by: Paul Gowder | Jul 3, 2008 11:58:49 PM

Wow.

The level of pretension on Prawfsblawg just increased precipitously, I think...

"...even to the Palo Alto Starbucks at the corner of Stanford Avenue and El Camino Real."

Puh-lease.

Here's an idea: F*** the wine bars. Go to a real bar; a place where people go to drink and be left mostly alone. It will probably be dark, and (even in NYC) it will have a vague stench of smoke around. Read whatever you want, work on a computer if that's your thing, and to hell with what anyone thinks of you -- as long as you're buying a drink now and again it doesn't matter.

(Also: try thinking about all this trivial stuff a bit less).

Posted by: C. Zorn | Jul 4, 2008 12:04:16 AM

While I can't speak to "legal academic work" (does reading Luban's Legal Ethics and Human Dignity count?), I find it necessary to work where there are fewest distractions, so, our son having moved out, our daughter rarely at home, and my wife with a day job, I typically work in our home at the dining table (which doubles as 'my' desk). It's relatively quiet unless cars drive by with their stereos blasting or gang-bangers are bashing things (sometimes each other) with baseball bats or crashing their cars (as happened not long ago when one group of kids was chasing another group of kids), or they're trimming trees that line our streets or on private property (which happens frequently around here). (Being an adjunct instructor, I don't have an office on campus to call my own, although I do share one with lots of my colleagues for office hours, and thus it's not appropriate for work owing to the short time allotment.)

Do folks really get a substantive amount of work done in public fora?

Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Jul 4, 2008 8:43:30 AM

Wow.

As we used to say in the Hoosier State, I think C. Zorn has been eating corn for breakfast (i.e., you gotta have some place to stick the cob). Aggro outburst aside, he does raise a good point: I often go to "a real bar" to edit papers and find the noise level and the disinterest of other patrons are just right for Barbeit.

But here's a thought: Maybe C. Zorn and I feel comfortable working in dark, smoky spaces only because we are men.

Posted by: D. Kysar | Jul 4, 2008 9:13:12 AM

I'm glad to see even the most hard-core habitues of the coffee bar have come to realize its shortcomings. I remember back when Starbucks was on the upswing, people recommending the chain and its products with the qualifier, "and I'm not even really a coffee person!" Exactly! A whip-cream-topped choco-mocachino is not coffee. We have a simpler word for it: milkshake. Much better to drink a glass of red wine than a bucket-sized venti dairy lipid bomb. When it comes to a workspace, I'd rather find a perch among slightly aenesthetized 21-and-olders rather than chemically perked patrons of all ages...

Posted by: H. Bogbinder | Jul 4, 2008 9:30:42 AM

When the odd becomes the commonplace, then the wonderful feeling of safari that one feels upon submerging in the unfamiliar - which is almost always conducive to creativity and unexpected thought - is lost.

--Jonathan

Posted by: Jonathan | Jul 4, 2008 10:56:24 AM

The Starbucks in Palo Alto? Try the Happy Donuts on El Camino. Hmmm. Donuts. Hmmm. Wirless donuts.

Posted by: brit-ex-nocal | Jul 4, 2008 11:33:32 AM

The comment about Starbucks as "milkshake" by H. Bogbinder reminds me of one of my favorite places to work, at least as a law student. Round about midnight, after I was done at the law library at Columbia, I would head to one of the many excellent diners around Morningside Heights to continue my reading over a proper diner milkshake, complete with the metal mixing cup containing the remainder of the shake. Now that was the way to work. Neither my GI tract nor my family or work schedule would really allow me to work over late-night milkshakes anymore, and in any event many of those classic New York diners have made way for fine dining and other inessentials. But for a proper work and reading space, it's still hard to do better than a good diner -- unless you're in Toronto and can select from among the roughly 10,000 donut shops.

Posted by: Paul Horwitz | Jul 4, 2008 3:20:49 PM

Not totally on point, but think I read somewhere that Jonathan Safran Foer writes at his friends' houses while they're at work. I'd like to do that.

Posted by: Zak Kramer | Jul 4, 2008 9:55:25 PM

Coffeeshops have their drawbacks--in LA, most commonly, the major problem is that industry types often set up shops and have deafening conversations about their nascent screenplays on their Bluetooth headsets--though they remain my go-to place to work. I actually prefer venues without internet access so I won't be tempted to email etc.

As for what kind of work is acceptable in other places, it shouldn't matter--after all, if you're paying you should be able to do what you want, and reading quietly is far less obtrusive than having some obnoxious conversation--but it depends on the kind of venue. I sometimes read over lunch at a restaurant, but I feel a bit guilty sticking around after I'm done with my food. After all, when the waitress takes your food away, you're taking up a table someone else could be at, and somehow it seems unfair to occupy that space when you're no longer generating any revenue for the establishment. I've still done this in relatively empty restaurants, sometimes, though always left a big tip afterward.

Wine bars are a tempting place to work, but if the etiquette is that you have to buy a beverage every half-hour or so, then by a couple hours in, the quality of the work may suffer, though not unpleasantly so.

Posted by: Dave | Jul 7, 2008 6:25:47 PM

But why be so excrutiatingly nervous on entry. I was sitting in very busy wine bar in central London last Friday lunchtime, when chap without preamble squeezed himself into seat at adjacent crowded table and proceeded to read article print-out from CLJ by one Geoffrey Samuel (about is law a social science...view from comparative law). Throughout his thirty minute read, he sipped gingerly from a glass of house red, and made the occasional under-the-breath exclamation of agreement re. what he was reading. Deeply, deeply impressed by the confidence of this fellow, his uninterest in his surroundings, his chutzpah, on return to base I printed off my own copy of the article. I enjoyed it, too. Lesson learnt - one may as well act confident, as not.

Posted by: Jeff | Jul 9, 2008 5:37:59 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.